About Me

Name: Doctor Poddy
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

War on terror

This Reuters report (via Lucianne) http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/international/ticker/detail/U_S_and_Iraqi_forces_kill_250_militants_in_Najaf.html?siteSect=143&sid=7473506&cKey=1170012159000
has an interesting point:
The fighting is in the same city where a million pilgrims will visit in the next week...is it Shiite followers of an apocalyptical nutcase, or is it Sunni who want to bomb and kill innocent civilians?
http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/topten/articles/20070128.aspx
and strategy page has a list of ten myths of the Iraq war.
Read it and get the news out

Finally, only tens of thousands at the anti war march, and some reports note most are aging hippies...
Probably more people attended the anti abortion march earlier in the week, but got little publicity.
Luckily both were on cspan, which we don't get here, but EWTN did show the March for life...

Sorry for the poor linkage. My right button is out, and if I have time I'll repost it neater using Google Documents to make the links nice and neat
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Philippine victory in WOT

this is an excerpt from my main blog:


The war on terror continues in the Philippines, with several recent battles that resulted the killing of second in command Sulaiman last week.

There was a large reward for Janjalani and Sulaiman and other Abu Sayyaf leaders, posted by the US government because they had kidnapped and beheaded an American, but too often western newssources forget that other people are involved in the fight, for their own reasons: Janjali has kidnapped and killed Philippinos, including 100 in a ferry that was bombed.

As a result of the peace talks, the MILF has decided to deny sanctuary to fleeing Abu Sayef terrorists, whose attacks on civilians go against Islamic law.

But experts warn that if the Philippine Army continues to attack such radicals might lead to more attacks by remaining personnel, and might push the survivors to more extreme actions (as if bombing a ferry is not already an extreme act).

This may be why the US is holding a three week training course in Taguig City, to teach first responders about both gas and radiological ("dirty bomb") attacks. The US has not been involved in the fighting, but has been active in training, logistics, and intelligence that assists the Philippine Armed Forces in the fight against groups with ties to international terrorist organizations.

There is a worry also that Islamic converts from Luzon, who know the language and culture of that region, will be used to attack vulnerable targets in the Manila region.

The war against Abu Sayyef has been mirrored in recent developments in Indonesia, where a push against terrorists has killed nine Jemaah Islamiah fighters in Sulawesi. That push was with the help of Australian and American special forces,...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming hype--expose on bbc

The BBC is one of the worst sites for global warming hysteria.

So I was delighted when this BBC 4 program essentially said:

The Stern report cherry picked facts and got them wrong.

The Press cherry picked the Stern Report and got things worse.

Stopping global warming will cost a lot more than you think.

LINK

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6295021.stm

read the whole thing and publicize it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US is unpopular: Lying with Statistics.

You probably have seen or heard about this poll: US popularity drops.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/22/AR2007012201300_pf.html

Well, sorry, but if you got all of your news from CNN Int and the BBC you'd think the US is lousy too.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6286755.stm

But when I looked at the poll, I noticed something interesting: The US was still popular in India, Nigeria, and in the Philippines.

And the BBC poll did not extrapolate the numbers for population in those countries.
http://geography.about.com/cs/worldpopulation/a/mostpopulous.htm

The War in Iraq: Disapproval highest in France and Argentina. Population: well, France has 80 million, but Argentina isn't on the top twenty countries.
People in India, Nigeria and the Philippines were more likely to approve.Population Two Billion.

You get the idea.

India, Nigeria, and the Philippines all are fighting a war against terrorism.

We just have media that doesn't see the opinions of non white and non European elites as worthy of being heard.

And, of course, it ignores that some of the countries with negative views of the US and Israel have state run media.

Sorry for the lack of decent linkage: COmputer slow today.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

blame bush of course

I am here listening to CNN where the implication of all the negative stories is that Bush is to blame for everything that happened in Iraq.
So Sunni Baathists who bomb innocent Sunni civilians at markets...is Bush's fault.
The Democrats and now Republicans say: Set a timetable, while the head of Alqaeda taunts the US that they will win in Iraq.
And although the hits against the Shiite hit squads and the fact that Sadr will now cooperate with the government is barely mentioned, only a hint about "mutilated" bodies.
Nope, don't mention that they just might be in retaliation for the bomb deaths.

Somalia, where deaths were unreported for ten years, now is being heralded...one a couple days ago about refugees, and now about some killed in riots.
Yet the refugees and three million killed in Central Africa are not mentioned, nor are the beatings of peaceful demonstrators in Zimbabwe,, nor Dafur, where the Sudanese Army is now bombing civilian villages to get at the rebels.
Indeed, the success of the Philippine Armed forces verifying they killed a major terrorist (who had kidnapped and beheaded a US tourist, and by the way killed 100 plus people by bombing a ferry) is not mentioned...rumors are that both the US and the Aussies are helping get the Abu Sayef and the search is now on for the Indonesians helping them, who helped in the Bali bombing.

In short, accentuate the negative, don't give context, and never, never support the US.

Figures.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What if the internet was down?

I haven't been neglectful of my blog.

You see, there was an earthquake off Taiwan that severed several internet and telephone lines from Asia to the USA. Reportedly it also affected phone calls for a short while but the main side effect was to crash the internet.

So for two weeks, no one could get on line from our town, and after two weeks, the local provider had to fix their line to Manila, and the line was only to the southend of our town.

Yahoo was the worst one: Completely unavailable for two weeks. Hot mail was slow but if you kept trying you could get on eventually.

Ironically, google and blogster worked. So on my main blog, I posted "headsup" to my family that we were fine, and to use my gmail (public) address.

This communications blackout didn't get much publicity even in the local press: The only tv news that covered it was on Bloomburg TV...as business news.

What this brought back to me is two things: One, that if you go by CNN International you don't know what is going on (BBC is better).

Two: Our communications line is vulnerable in emergencies.

A couple months ago, I ran across a news article on Morse code now being called obselete. Yet the reason Morse code was valuable was that you could hear it despite static, or at least hear part of the message.

If internet and phone lines can be destroyed by earthquakes, there is a real possibility that the internet and phone will be useless in times of war and disaster. Cellphones are valuable, but in a quake, or when people like the local NPA blow them up, they too are vulnerable to fall over and be useless.

Ah, but how about satellites?

Three: The Chinese just zapped a weather satellite out of the sky, making even CNNInt hyperventilate about how they could zap our communications and GPS systems (no mention that it was the Clinton administration that allowed the technology to be sold to China but never mind. It's all Bush's fault on CNN International).

But it doesn't even take the Chinese. Major solar flares can disrupt shortwave and a massive flare can mess up satellite TV, and presumably satellites etc.

So if there is a major war, we are in deep doo doo. The internet could be a target (one bomb to a major link) satellites zapped, and of course, the electromagnetic pulse could destroy the chip in the carborator of your BMW...

The good news is that the Chinese want to take over the world, but are unlikely to start a war. Like the Americans, they just want to make money.

And despite the hype about the Iranian bomb, there just aren't enough to destroy more than a couple cities (yes, terrible...but not "MAD" or mutually assured destruction like we lived with in the 1950's and 1960's.

Summary: Don't rely on the internet for disasters. An old fashioned HAM radio with morse code and using old fashioned tubes or large transisters and on a diesel generator backup will be the best bet.

And we can always fall back on homing pigeons...






Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »